KAJIAN PRAKTIS PENILAIAN BENDA CAGAR BUDAYA LOGAM (DALAM PENENTUAN IMBALAN JASA)
Keywords:
archaeological heritage, metal, rewards, found, assesmentAbstract
Value assesment of metal artifacts for compensation is problematic in heritage management. In Indonesia, there is no guideline to value a metal artifact and archaeological offices use different standard to determine the value metal artifacts. This has been seen as unjust among the society. In this paper, three essential aspects are proposed to be used in interpreting and identifying metal artifacts for compensation: context, rarity, and age. These three aspects are “inner considerationsâ€. Along side with those aspects, we need to also consider other two “outer considerationsâ€, i.e. present standard price for metal and collector's price. Combining those inner and outer considerations will help greatly to determine the value of metal artifacts for compensation.
Downloads
References
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1977. Himpunan Perundang — undangan Republik Indonesia tentang Benda Cagar Budaya. Jakarta.
Michels, Joseph W. 1973. Dating Methods in Archeology. New York.
Pearson, M. P. dan S. Sullivan. 1995. Looking after heritage places. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Renfrew, Colin dan Bahn, Paul. 1991. Archeology Theories Methods and Practise. London.
Sainth, George S. dan Ehrenhard, John E. 2002. “Protecting the Past to Benefit the Publicâ€. Dalam Public benefit of Archeology. University Press of Florida.
Sharer, Robert J. dan Ashmore, Wendy. 2003. Archeology Discovering our Past. New York.
Tanudirjo, Daud A. 2004. Penentuan Nilai Penting dalam Pengelolaan Benda Cagar Budaya. Jakarta.
Triharyantoro, Edi. 2000. “Potensi Kelangkaan Benda Cagar Budayaâ€. Bulletin Cagar Budaya. Jakarta.
Van der Meulen S. J., W. J. 1987. Ilmu Sejarah dan Filsafat. Kanisius. Jakarta.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.